《龙凤呈祥》演播为中泰文化交流再谱华彩乐章******
中新网北京1月31日电 据国家京剧院消息，1月30日，浓浓的年味还未散尽，国家京剧院一团团长、一级演员李胜素，一级演员江其虎等，携经典大戏《龙凤呈祥》演播参加曼谷中国文化中心欢乐春节系列活动之一——“京剧《龙凤呈祥》演播·中泰戏曲对话”活动。剧院艺术家与泰国观众“云端”相见，京剧《龙凤呈祥》以线上演播的形式，与泰国优泰剧展开对话，共庆喜庆祥和的传统佳节。中国驻泰国大使馆临时代办杨欣专门以视频形式致辞，泰国文化部副常秘玉提佳女士出席活动并代表泰国文化部致辞，曼谷中国文化中心兼驻曼谷旅游办主任阙小华、曼谷中国文化中心副主任赵歆等近200位各界人士现场参与了活动。
中国驻泰国大使馆临时代办杨欣致辞首先，杨欣代办通过视频形式对此次活动致以贺词。杨欣代办表示，京剧艺术蕴涵中华优秀传统文化的理念与智慧，此次活动搭建起“以戏为桥、以戏会友”的平台，让更多戏曲爱好者感受中泰传统戏曲魅力，深入了解文化交流在中泰关系中的重要作用，鼓励更多有识之士携起手来，共同推动文化传播事业在新的历史起点上蓬勃发展，为中泰命运共同体建设贡献人文力量。
曼谷中国文化中心主任阙小华(左)向泰国文化部副常秘玉提佳(右)赠送欢乐春节兔年吉祥物泰国文化部副常秘玉提佳高度评价中国京剧在文化传播方面发挥的积极作用，称其是密切和深化中泰文化交流的重要桥梁。曼谷中国文化中心主任阙小华表示，京剧是中国传统文化的经典，优泰剧是中国戏曲文化在海外的优秀传承和发展，两种戏曲交融互鉴，让优秀戏曲艺术得到更深远的传承和更广泛的弘扬。
国家京剧院艺术家与泰国观众互动活动中，李胜素、江其虎两位艺术家向泰国观众致以新春的问候，介绍了自己在剧中扮演的角色，回顾以往与泰国进行文化交流的经历，并表达了对未来两国文化交流的美好期待。江其虎老师深入浅出地介绍了《龙凤呈祥》的精彩看点和创排过程，表示这部戏将《三国演义》中孙刘两家一场针锋相对的明争暗斗用老百姓喜闻乐见的办喜事的过程表现出来，充满喜剧色彩的剧情和行当齐全的阵容，让这部戏成为中国人逢年过节必看的吉祥大戏。接下来，展示了《龙凤呈祥》的精彩片段，剧院优秀青年演员刘垒、朱虹教授泰国的京剧爱好者不同行当的念白和唱段，观众踊跃报名，纷纷尝试学习，现场气氛在李胜素、江其虎老师对学员的点评和与观众的互动中推向高潮。
观众们纷纷表示，活动内容丰富多彩，京剧名家的精彩讲解和点评，青年演员的示范表演以及与观众的互动，使大家真切地感受到了京剧之美和中国传统艺术的魅力。
活动下半场，优泰剧创始人庄美隆向观众介绍了优泰剧在泰国的发展，泰中戏剧艺术学会进行表演并与观众互动，现场观众无不为两种戏曲文化的互通交融所打动。
中泰嘉宾在线合影在文化和旅游部产业发展司、中国对外文化交流协会的指导和支持下，自2021年以来，国家京剧院携手中国移动咪咕公司，连续三年打造国粹经典《龙凤呈祥》演播盛会，以5G+4K超高清技术，将经典名剧送入“云端”，为众多热爱京剧的观众献上这出融合了科技元素的传统剧目。如果说2021年是《龙凤呈祥》演播实践之年，打造了5G时代云演播行业新标杆；2022年《龙凤呈祥》二度“上云”是在理论建构的基础上探寻演播的无限可能；2023年则是《龙凤呈祥》演播走向世界、全面开花之年。在海外融媒传播的有力基础上，《龙凤呈祥》主创团队首次与海外观众连线互动，多视角、零距离的呈现，让海外戏迷们获得了前所未有的观看体验。国家京剧院携手中国移动咪咕公司，将《龙凤呈祥》打造为具有国际影响力的演播品牌，为中华优秀传统文化的海外传播做出贡献。
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
